Kazakhstan: Country Again Features in U.S.
Efforts to Combat Corruption
By
Nikola Krastev
It is a crime under U.S. law for individuals or companies to bribe
officials in a foreign country in order to gain a business advantage. Kazakhstan was
placed in the spotlight six years ago by the emergence of the "Kazakhgate"
scandal alleging that a U.S. citizen funneled millions in oil-concession fees to Kazakh
officials. Now, a new investigation of leading oil-and-gas-services provider Baker Hughes
serves as the latest example of authorities' increased efforts to stem corruption by U.S.
companies operating overseas.
New York, 23 May 2005 (RFE/RL) -- The U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission -- the government agency overseeing financial and legal compliance of American
companies -- on 22 April subpoenaed Baker Hughes seeking information about the
Houston-based company's operations in Kazakhstan.
Gary Flaharty, a public relations officer at Baker Hughes, told RFE/RL
that the subpoena is considered a confidential inquiry and that the company does not
disclose details.
"It's a situation that we're working through with the Department
of Justice and we are cooperating fully with their investigation. But other than the fact
that we received that [subpoena] on April 22 I don't have any other additional
information. Given that it's an ongoing investigation it would be improper for us to
comment on it," Flaharty said.
In 2000, Baker Hughes won a contract to provide integrated services to
the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating consortium for its Karachaganak oil and gas field in
Kazakhstan. The company maintains offices in Kazakhstan's commercial capital Almaty and in
the towns of Aksai and Atyrau.
"We do not view that James Giffen' case [has anything to do with
us]. In the view of Kazakhstan this is the case between U.S. citizen James Giffen and the
U.S. government and we don't see any involvement of either Kazakhstan or anybody official
from Kazakhstan to be involved."
Public relations officer Flaharty told RFE/RL that Baker Hughes
operates in more than 80 countries and that its Kazakhstan operations are not among its
top five.
"We do have operations in Kazakhstan. We do not comment in detail
on what we do in any particular country but we do have operations in Kazakhstan. We only
comment on the top five or six countries where we do business and Kazakhstan is not in
that list," Flaharty said.
John Heine, a press relations officer for the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, told RFE/RL that as a rule the commission does not comment on ongoing
investigations.
But while little is known about the reasons for the subpoena, the
investigation highlights the U.S. government's recent efforts to enforce its Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act. The act includes a statute aimed at preventing bribery by U.S.
parties overseas, and several firms that have paid to foreign officials have been
prosecuted for violations.
The largest case ever heard in connection with alleged violations of
the act centers on Kazakhstan.
Dubbed "Kazakhgate," the six-year-old case pertains to
allegations that James Giffen -- a U.S. citizen and a former consultant to the Kazakh
government -- violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by funneling more than $78
million from oil-concession fees to Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbaev, his family, and
other Kazakh officials.
U.S. Federal Judge William Pauley recently postponed the trial date to
January 2006 -- marking the third time the case has been delayed.
The case has caused diplomatic tension between the U.S. and Kazakhstan,
which has tried repeatedly to persuade U.S. officials to use their influence to drop it.
Karim Massimov, who is President Nazarbaev's chief policy adviser,
reiterated in New York last week that the Kazakh government sees no part in the pending
trial.
"We do not view that James Giffen' case [has anything to do with
us]. In the view of Kazakhstan this is the case between U.S. citizen James Giffen and the
U.S. government and we don't see any involvement of either Kazakhstan or anybody official
from Kazakhstan to be involved. That's why we treat it as a U.S. internal case and we
don't think it will have [adverse] effect to Kazakhstan,” Massimov said.
Massimov described the level of cooperation between U.S. and the Kazakh
authorities with regard to "Kazakhgate" as very good.
“We do have a cooperation with U.S. Justice Department. Whatever
questions they have toward the government of Kazakhstan -- we share all the information,
we don't have any problem with that," Massimov said.
Charles Both, a U.S. attorney who is familiar with Kazakh affairs,
explained how the postponement of Giffen's trial can bolster his defense. Giffen faces up
to 88 years in jail if convicted on all counts.
"I think defendants always have more advantage in postponing the
case. People's memories change, they don't have any burden, the burden is on prosecution
to prove it," Both said.
William Schwartz, an attorney with Giffen's defense team, declined
comment to RFE/RL.
RFE/RL, Mat 23, 2005
http://www.rferl.org/ |